Thu, Oct 8

POL 309-800, International Law
SUNY Oswego | Fall 2020
Dr. Craig Warkentin

Reading

Goals

  • Recognize and describe each zone discussed in today's reading
  • Delineate the rights and responsibilities that attach to each zone
  • archipelago (245)
  • bay (232)
  • contiguous zone (386)
  • force majeure (249)
  • historic bay (234)
  • innocent passage (237)
  • internal waters (232)
  • territorial sea (235)

Participation

Preliminaries

Questions

P. 245

  1. Under the 1982 Convention did the DAUNTLESS have the right to enter Haitian territorial waters and search and seize the NAHOA without seeking permission from the Haitian authorities?
  2. Suppose the DAUNTLESS had not sought permission to enter Haitian territorial waters. Would that have altered the outcome of the case?
  3. Suppose the DAUNTLESS had asked permission to enter Haitian territorial waters but the permission had been denied. Nonetheless, the DAUNTLESS seized the NAHOA. Would that have altered the outcome in the case?
  4. Suppose the DAUNTLESS had sought permission from Haiti to enter [its] territorial waters and that permission had been denied but that the DAUNTLESS nonetheless seized the NAHOA. Haiti then delivered a protest to the U.S. government. Would that have altered the outcome of the case?

P. 251

Resources